Tuesday, July 24, 2012
All Sports! All The Time!
And they suck me back in. With all this Lance Armstrong stuff, I swore I'd walk away from pro cycling. Armstrong has been out of the pro ranks for almost a decade now, he's never tested positive, but the movers and shakers of cycling have decided to go back and destroy his legacy. There's something about that sport that wants to self destruct. I suspect it's because it's a professional sport run by an Olympics federation, and those are run by a bunch of silly old Europeans who don't understand why the French revolution happened. Too, to return to a point I've made before. Cycling has become a big time, worldwide sport because of television. The TV people want hard climbs,. fast technical descents, and crash filled bunch sprints. Really, it's making the sport worse. The UCI wants the major teams in every major race, and the number of those races is increasing every year. The sponsors want their corporate logos on the podium, the team owners are desperate to get those victories, and team managers are desperate to keep their jobs. Basically, a system where it's almost impossible to survive without some help, but it's only the riders that take the blame. To be honest, I don't even care if Lance Armstrong doped. More than likely every rider in the top twenty was on something. Yes, I swore to give up the sport, but then the Tour de France came along and I fell into line. Oh well.
Is it just me? Are there others out there who hope that the London branch of the occupy movement disrupts the Olympics? For all the fine talk about pure sport the Olympics are a rich mans vanity event. Only the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics has turned a profit. If London ends up another money loser, it's the lower middle classes and the poor who will pay in the form of even more cuts in services. Too, the land for all those bright and shiny new venues had to come from somewhere. No rich people were harmed for the London Olympics. No, it was the homes and businesses of the lower middle classes and poor that were sacrificed.
Monday, April 25, 2011
The Royal Wedding

Didn't we fight a revolution so we could ignore these people? The idea of an inherited monarchy is absurd. The notion that a family is owed deference, loyalty or reverence because of an accident of birth is so stupid that it defies all reason. That so many people, around the world, care about this wedding is insane.
What really bothers me is that so many of my fellow Americans, citizens of a free republic, descended from founders who were willing to die so that we would not have to bow down to a king are all a flutter about the House of Windsor. I can remember a column by the late Mike Royko about a visit by Prince Philip to Chicago. It seems that the royal dullness was quite put out that Americans felt free to approach him on something other than bended knee. Royko pointed out to Phil that had it not been for the citizens of our republic his polo pony would be branded with a swastika and he should show a little humility. I agree, and I also think that if the British had any common sense, they'd boot the Windsors to a much deserved exile in some former colony that was raped and pillaged in the name of god, king, and country.
