Showing posts with label Republican convention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican convention. Show all posts
Thursday, July 21, 2016
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
The Lap of Luxury
I kind of feel sorry for Melania Trump. I suspect she sold her youth for a luxurious life style for herself and her family. I doubt she ever suspected that her oaf of a husband would run for the presidency and hold her up to a certain level of public humiliation.
One of the sad things about the whole plagiarism things is that it has drawn attention away from the ravings of Dumbo's supporters at the Repug convention. In general, I hate Nazi analogies, but let's be honest, Rudy was a few minutes away from calling for concentration camps for American Muslims. General Michael Flynn was also pretty sad. Apart from being a horrible public speaker, until Donnie came around, the retired General was a life long, pro choice Democrat, yet he was willing to throw it all away for a very slight chance to be on the losing ticket. And would someone please tell Antonio Sabato Jr., that President Obama is not a secret Muslim. Now I have my doubts that the Prez is all that religious, but come on, the next thing we'll see is some sort of birther nut opening his big mouth, and wouldn't that be pathetic.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Rubio Vs Castro, More than One Castro
Now that we've seen both conventions, there is one thing we can be certain of: Both parities are trying to present an Hispanic face.
The Republicans are pinning their hopes on Marco Rubio, while Democrats are going with the far more telegenic Julian Castro. Castro, despite his last name, is of Mexican descent while Rubio has Cuban roots, and on the surface, with far greater numbers of Mexican immigrants, that would seem like a bad bet for the Republicans.
I agree with that, but for different reasons. Rubio isn't just Cuban, he is a throwback to a community that defines itself as anti-communist and distrusting of government, while Mexican-Americans are far more likely to look to government as a fair arbiter for full integration into the American mainstream. And let's face it, with its embrace of Jan Brewer and the politics of anti-immigration hatred, the Repugs aren't exactly endearing themselves to the far larger Mexican American demographic.
But it goes beyond that. Rubio is a really, really, big throwback. Today's younger Cuban-Americans may agree with their grandfathers that Fidel Castro is an evil man and that Cuba should be free and democratic, (I'm a white, liberal Democrat and I think that too.) but those young Cuban Americans have never know Cuba and communist oppression. What they know is increasing college tuition, and high youth unemployment. And those are issues that are far stronger for Democrats than Republicans.
I found it telling that Cuban-American talk show host Cristina Saralegui chose to endorse President Barack Obama for reelection. In theory, she should be a Republican. Unlike Marco Rubio, she was born in Cuba, and she does have memories of Fidel and the revolution. But in her world view, we look forward to the future, not back to the past. I'm sure she would love to see a fair and free election in Havana, but she'd also like to see social progress, a progress built on economic justice and opportunity for all, in the United States.
One other note. In 2004 Illinois State Senator Barack Obama gave the key note address at the Democratic National Convention, and after he was done, many people, myself included, said to themselves. "I've just seen the first African-American president." How many people said that Rubio will be the first Hispanic-American president? How many thought that of Castro? . Pay attention. I don't often agree with George W. Bush or brother Jeb. Their contention that pissing off Hispanics is a good way to destroy the Republican Party is dead on.
The Republicans are pinning their hopes on Marco Rubio, while Democrats are going with the far more telegenic Julian Castro. Castro, despite his last name, is of Mexican descent while Rubio has Cuban roots, and on the surface, with far greater numbers of Mexican immigrants, that would seem like a bad bet for the Republicans.
I agree with that, but for different reasons. Rubio isn't just Cuban, he is a throwback to a community that defines itself as anti-communist and distrusting of government, while Mexican-Americans are far more likely to look to government as a fair arbiter for full integration into the American mainstream. And let's face it, with its embrace of Jan Brewer and the politics of anti-immigration hatred, the Repugs aren't exactly endearing themselves to the far larger Mexican American demographic.
But it goes beyond that. Rubio is a really, really, big throwback. Today's younger Cuban-Americans may agree with their grandfathers that Fidel Castro is an evil man and that Cuba should be free and democratic, (I'm a white, liberal Democrat and I think that too.) but those young Cuban Americans have never know Cuba and communist oppression. What they know is increasing college tuition, and high youth unemployment. And those are issues that are far stronger for Democrats than Republicans.
I found it telling that Cuban-American talk show host Cristina Saralegui chose to endorse President Barack Obama for reelection. In theory, she should be a Republican. Unlike Marco Rubio, she was born in Cuba, and she does have memories of Fidel and the revolution. But in her world view, we look forward to the future, not back to the past. I'm sure she would love to see a fair and free election in Havana, but she'd also like to see social progress, a progress built on economic justice and opportunity for all, in the United States.
One other note. In 2004 Illinois State Senator Barack Obama gave the key note address at the Democratic National Convention, and after he was done, many people, myself included, said to themselves. "I've just seen the first African-American president." How many people said that Rubio will be the first Hispanic-American president? How many thought that of Castro? . Pay attention. I don't often agree with George W. Bush or brother Jeb. Their contention that pissing off Hispanics is a good way to destroy the Republican Party is dead on.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Thick As A Brick
A few thoughts on Mitt's speech.
Mitt brought up his father, former governor and Republican candidate for president, George Romney. Papa Romney was most famous for his principled stand against Goldwater/Miller extremism. Mitt's political career has been, like his father's, one of moderation, but he has shown a lack of principal in embracing Tea Party extremism.
Would someone please tell anti-government Repugs to stop praising the Apollo program and the greatest generation. The Apollo program was one of the biggest government programs in history. The greatest generation was the generation of Franklin Roosevelt and big, really big, government.
The Republican party is not the party of small business. It's the party of transnational corporations and big finance. Someone opening a store has more to worry about from financial markets and Walmart than they do from government. Mr. Bain isn't likely to regulate big banks, or enforce anti-trust law. Given the power by congress, President Obama might. A good reason to vote Democratic in congressional races.
Mittens wasn't a business man, he was an investor. Big difference.
Is Romney a nice guy or a bully? It's possible to be both. The general public might prefer a nice guy but the Repug base likes a kick ass bully. While the elephants are criticizing the Obama campaign for fighting dirty, O has nothing on the Romney super pacs.
Maybe, just maybe, Mitt could overcome his character defects, but not if he continues with stiff performances like we saw tonight.
Mitt brought up his father, former governor and Republican candidate for president, George Romney. Papa Romney was most famous for his principled stand against Goldwater/Miller extremism. Mitt's political career has been, like his father's, one of moderation, but he has shown a lack of principal in embracing Tea Party extremism.
Would someone please tell anti-government Repugs to stop praising the Apollo program and the greatest generation. The Apollo program was one of the biggest government programs in history. The greatest generation was the generation of Franklin Roosevelt and big, really big, government.
The Republican party is not the party of small business. It's the party of transnational corporations and big finance. Someone opening a store has more to worry about from financial markets and Walmart than they do from government. Mr. Bain isn't likely to regulate big banks, or enforce anti-trust law. Given the power by congress, President Obama might. A good reason to vote Democratic in congressional races.
Mittens wasn't a business man, he was an investor. Big difference.
Is Romney a nice guy or a bully? It's possible to be both. The general public might prefer a nice guy but the Repug base likes a kick ass bully. While the elephants are criticizing the Obama campaign for fighting dirty, O has nothing on the Romney super pacs.
Maybe, just maybe, Mitt could overcome his character defects, but not if he continues with stiff performances like we saw tonight.
Clint
I admire Clint Eastwood the film director. I think he has made some of the best film of the past several decades. I admire Clint Eastwood the actor. I'm looking forward to seeing his new film, Trouble With the Curve, and would be quite happy if he were to finally win a much deserved acting Academy Award to go with his directing Oscars. I do background work in the movies and spent some time on the set of Million Dollar Baby and found him to be a gracious and thoughtful person.
But his performance at the Republican National Convention was just sad and strange. The interview with the empty chair, standing in for President Obama, full of sarcasm and at lest two allusions to an obscenity was beneath him. One of Eastwood's strengths as an actor and director is an eye to a good script. I don't know who wrote Clint's convention words, but he doesn't have a future in Hollywood.
But his performance at the Republican National Convention was just sad and strange. The interview with the empty chair, standing in for President Obama, full of sarcasm and at lest two allusions to an obscenity was beneath him. One of Eastwood's strengths as an actor and director is an eye to a good script. I don't know who wrote Clint's convention words, but he doesn't have a future in Hollywood.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



