We all know that mental illness can cause homelessness, but can homelessness cause mental illness? There is a woman who wanders the streets of my neighborhood. I first saw her about a year ago. She was well dressed, clean and dragging around one of those wheeled suit cases. A few days latter, I saw her again. This time she was getting thrown out of a store. She was yelling that it wasn't her fault that her boyfriend had thrown her out and she had no place to go.
As the year has passed, she's gotten dirtier, shabbier, and crazier. This afternoon, I saw her at her usual spot, yelling at no one in particular, in what sounded like Italian. As a homeless person, she is isolated. She may see hundreds, perhaps even thousands of people every day, but she has little or no contact with any of them. She just sits there, alone, surrounded by people. I've read that prisoners held in isolation for long periods of time go slowly, irreversibly nuts. I doubt this woman has had a real conversation with another person for the year she's been wandering around the streets. For all I know, even though things seemed normal, she had emotional problems when her boyfriend gave her the boot. But there's no doubt, that things have gotten far worse in the last twelve months. At what point will her descent into madness be irreversible?
Monday, June 17, 2013
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
If the leadership of LACMA, The Los Angeles County Museum of Art, has it's way, the core buildings of the museum will be torn down and a brand new gallery will replace them. I won't comment on the design. The photo of the model that I've seen isn't really good enough to have even a vague opinion. Nevertheless, I think it's a bad idea.
From what I've been able to find out, (And this information is all rather preliminary, and may be inaccurate.) the new core building, designed by Swiss architect Peter Zumthor, will have approximately the same display space as the buildings it will replace. It makes me wonder, exactly, what is LACMA's mission? It's a county museum, that attempts to show an over view of world art. It's not a museum that's dedicated to a single artist, artistic movement, or a particular regional art. Too, Los Angeles is a city with many wealthy arts patrons who can be tapped for both money and donations of art work. But without increased space, LACMA is stalled in what it can show the public.
Go to the LACMA website and click collections. The museum has a large photography collection that isn't being displayed. The Robert Gore Rifken collection of German expressionistic art is good sized, but only a small fraction of it can be seen at one time because of space restrictions. And why would a wealthy, Los Angeles art collector donate his or her collection when there is no space to display it?
It seems to me, rather then spending an estimated $650 million on a new building at the mid-Wilshire museum location, it would make more sense to build a new gallery at another location. Had LACMA's attempt to take over the Museum of Contemporary Art in downtown L.A. gone through, the county museum would have been operating two buildings a t a remote location. So why not save the space that's already at the main campus and build somewhere else?
In the same issue of the Los Angeles Times that published the photograph of Zumthor's model, there was a story about an abandoned building in Compton. It was a church designed by modernist architect, Rudolph Schindler. It's boarded up and covered in graffiti. LACMA administration should reject the notion that museums should be built in upscale neighborhoods with chic shops, restaurants, and an abundance of hip, young, urbanites. Land would be cheap in Compton, and a new art museum that also preserves a Schindler building...well, why not? Why not build next to the Watts Towers or in an industrial space along the L.A. River?